icone
+91 9540 15 0003
+91 9540 16 0003
info
info@legalarclawfirm.com
legalarclawfirm@gmail.com
Trademark Services in India
Read More...
Copyright Services in India
Read More...
Patent Services in India
Read More...
Design Services India
Read More...
header
header
one
Trademark
d

A trademark can be a word, phrase, letter, number, sound, smell, shape, logo, picture or a combination of these…
Read More…

one
Copyright

The term copyright refers to a bundle of exclusive rights granted to the author or creator of an original work…
Read More…

one
Patent

A patent is a legal monopoly granted by a state to the owner of an invention for a limited time…
Read More…

one
Design

An industrial design right is an intellectual property right that protects the visual design of objects that are not purely utilitarian…
Read More..


Quick Contact
Name Email Address
Business Name Contact Number
Your Message
IPR News
Sep 16, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF DELHI) [Radico Khaitan Limited v/s. Carslberg India Private Limited] Plaintif using mark 8PM for whiskey since 1999 – Plaintiff is a registered proprietor of Trade Mark 8PM/8PM family of marks – In January 2011 Defendant launched PALONE 8 in India stronger variant of OKOCIM PALONE under PALONE 8 - Defendant applied for registration of the label PALONE 8, PALONE 8 DUMDAR MEL and 8 KA DUM - Defendant claimed that plaintiff has no registration for Beer and only engaged in business of manufacturing and marketing of Whisky & Rum.

Jul 4, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF DELHI) [Arun Jaitley v/s. Network Solutions Private Limited & Others] Domain name WWW.ARUNJAITELY.COM – Plaintiff a prominent leader of a political party desired to book the impugned domain name – Defendant companies are registrar of domain names – Impugned domain name not removed by previous owner and was pending deletion – Defendants permanently restrained from using, promoting, restraining, advertising or parting with the impugned domain name and liable to pay punitive damages.

Jul 4, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF DELHI) [United Biotech Pvt. Ltd. v/s. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd.] Plaintiff user of registered trademark FORZID for generic Schedule-H drug CeftaZIDime – Respondent using prior registered trademark ORZID – High Court of Madras observed ORZID AND FORZID had phonetically similarity. Held: Mere pre-fixing of letter “F” to the mark of respondent fails to distinguish FORZID sufficiently from ORZID.
Apr 5, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY) [Kamat Hotels (India) Limited v/s. Royal Orchid Hotels Limited and Another] Use of Trademark “ORCHID” for Hotel business – Plaintiff claimant to have been using the mark since 1997 – Suit proceedings commenced in 2008 – Defendant had already commenced business in 2008 and was running with eleven hotels with the name “ORCHID” – Interim injunction granted only in respect of opening any new hotel or new line of business.

 

 

Trademark Services
Trademark Service Area