logo
Follow us on:
095 40 15 0003  |  095 40 16 0003 info@legalarclawfirm.com  |  legalarclawfirm@gmail.com
Trademark Services in India
Read More...
Copyright Services in India
Read More...
Patent Services in India
Read More...
Design Services India
Read More...
header
header
one
Trademark
d

A trademark can be a word, phrase, letter, number, sound, smell, shape, logo, picture or a combination of these…
Read More…

one
Copyright

The term copyright refers to a bundle of exclusive rights granted to the author or creator of an original work…
Read More…

one
Patent

A patent is a legal monopoly granted by a state to the owner of an invention for a limited time…
Read More…

one
Design

An industrial design right is an intellectual property right that protects the visual design of objects that are not purely utilitarian…
Read More..


Quick Contact
Name Email Address
Business Name Contact Number
Your Message
IPR News



Oct 31, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF DELHI) [Zippo Manufacturing Company v/s. Anil Moolchandani & Ors.] Section 29, 30 - Passing off - Infringement of copyright - Plaintiff company registered in U.S.A. - Trade mark ZIPPO owned by plaintiff for manufacturing and sale of lighter - Alleged that goods under trade mark - ZIPPO - have been available in India at duty free shops - Plaintiff company also holds a number of other registration of trade mark ZIPPO in its favour in respect of product other than lighter - Defendant No. 2 selling counterfeit ZIPPO lighter from various outlets in Delhi.

July 24, 2012
(HIGH COURT OF DELHI) [Simla Chemicals Pvt. Ltd v/s. Sun Soap Industries & Ors.] Section 28 and 29 -Suit for infringement of Trade Mark "Simco" used for hair fixture, hair gels, Lotions & Cosmetics etc. - Defendant using the same Trade mark - Plaintiff has right to protect his trade name from infringement as also to take action of passing of in respect of its trade name - Defendant's activities are manifestly malafide and deceptive - Decree of permanent injunction granted.

Jul 4, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF DELHI) [United Biotech Pvt. Ltd. v/s. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd.] Plaintiff user of registered trademark FORZID for generic Schedule-H drug CeftaZIDime – Respondent using prior registered trademark ORZID – High Court of Madras observed ORZID AND FORZID had phonetically similarity. Held: Mere pre-fixing of letter “F” to the mark of respondent fails to distinguish FORZID sufficiently from ORZID.

Sep 08, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF DELHI) [Lalit Kumar Arya v/s. Apsana Global Sugandhy] Trade Mark 'RATNA CHHAP ZAFRANI PATTI No. 300' registered in respect of chewing tobacco in favour of plaintiff - Defendant using the mark 'RAFIYA CHHAP ZAFRANI PATTI No. 306' - Deceptive similarity in the packaging, style, fonts, type phase and colour scheme - Likelihood of confusion - Interim injunction granted against the defendant from using the packaging/labels in question.

Aug 24, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA) [Tea Board India v/s. I.T.C. Limited] Defendant using the mark 'Darjeeling Lounge' for one of its lounges in its hotel - Defendant registered owner of the mark in class 30 of the Act of 1958 in respect of tea - Right of Registration in respect of goods 'tea' does not confer any right over the word 'Darjeeling' to prevent defendant from rendering hospitality services under said name - Held that interim injunction rightly refused to the plaintiff.

Jul 4, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF DELHI) [Arun Jaitley v/s. Network Solutions Private Limited & Others] Domain name WWW.ARUNJAITELY.COM – Plaintiff a prominent leader of a political party desired to book the impugned domain name – Defendant companies are registrar of domain names – Impugned domain name not removed by previous owner and was pending deletion – Defendants permanently restrained from using, promoting, restraining, advertising or parting with the impugned domain name and liable to pay punitive damages.

Apr 5, 2011
(HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY) [Kamat Hotels (India) Limited v/s. Royal Orchid Hotels Limited and Another] Use of Trademark “ORCHID” for Hotel business – Plaintiff claimant to have been using the mark since 1997 – Suit proceedings commenced in 2008 – Defendant had already commenced business in 2008 and was running with eleven hotels with the name “ORCHID” – Interim injunction granted only in respect of opening any new hotel or new line of business.

 

 

Trademark & Copyright Services
Trademark Service Area
Copyright Service Area